Therapists' Perception on Quality of Provider Communication While Wearing a Mask: Impact of a Pandemic.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention established infection prevention recommendations, resulting in hospital systems adopting universal mask-wearing. Mask-wearing and its impact on patient-provider communication have been highlighted, yet have not been systematically studied to date. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of mask-wearing on provider communication during wheelchair education. Allied health professionals (65 physical and occupational therapists and 1 other) completed a 24-item, online self-report survey on the impact of provider mask-wearing on communication with patients and/or their caregivers during wheelchair education. This survey contained questions, graded on 5-point Likert-like scales, regarding the perceived impact of mask-wearing on the quality of communication efficiency and effectiveness, the types and frequency of communication strategies used to enhance communication during breakdowns, knowledge/confidence in implementing communication strategies, and preferences for additional training. Results indicated that mask-wearing impacted communication, yet clinicians made adaptations of various verbal and nonverbal communication strategies to avoid disruptions in providing education. Clinicians identified training preferences for additional support with provider communication. As the pandemic continues, patient-provider communication can be supported through targeted training in communication strategies.

Inpatient rehabilitation wheelchair management quality improvement project: Implications for patients with spinal cord injury.

Context/Objective: Evaluate hospital fleet wheelchair (WC) requests submitted by physical therapists (PT) for patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) to trial and use during inpatient rehabilitation.Design: Quality improvement project secondary analysis of delivery process and WC trials.Setting: Urban inpatient rehabilitation hospital.Participants: Internal review of 4,371 WC requests narrowed to 750 patients with SCI.Interventions: PTs submitted WC requests between March 25, 2017, and September 30, 2019.Outcome Measures: WC delivery timeframe, level of SCI, type of WC.Results: PTs requested power (28%), and manual WC bases: standard (19.1%), tilt (18.9%), ultralight rigid (18.9%), ultralight folding (13.5%), and recliner (1.6%) respectively. Patients received fleet WCs 49.9% of the time within specified urgency timeframes. A Chi-Square test showed a significant association between WC request urgency and fulfillment within established timeframes (χ2 = 19.68, P < 0.001, n = 750). Broken down by urgency level: 60.0% low (n = 12), 56.2% medium (n = 244), and 39.9% high (n = 118) received their WC within established timeframes. Patients with cervical level SCI (n = 162) had the highest mean wait time of 8.28 days for power WCs. The second highest wait time was 6.29 days (SD 6.6) for manual ultralight rigid WCs (n = 34).Conclusion: Inpatient fleet WC delivery is critical to patients with SCI. Variation occurs by WC type requested and by the level of injury. Gaps exist in providing appropriate WCs in facility timeframe guidelines by the level of urgency that is within 24 h for high, 3-5 days for medium, and 5-7 days for low.

A Mobility Measure for Inpatient Rehabilitation Using Multigroup, Multidimensional Methods.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) report patient functional status to Medicare and other payers using Quality Indicators (QI). While the QI is useful for payment purposes, its measurement properties are limited for monitoring patient progress. A mobility measure based on QI items and additional standardized assessments may enhance clinicians' ability to track patient improvement. Thus, we developed the Mobility Ability Quotient (Mobility AQ) to assess mobility during inpatient rehabilitation. METHODS: For 10 036 IRF inpatients, we extracted assessments from electronic health records, used confirmatory factor analysis to define subdimensions of mobility, and then applied multidimensional item response theory (MIRT) methods to develop a unidimensional construct. Assessments included the QI items and standardized measures of mobility, motor performance, and wheelchair and transfer skills. RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analysis resulted in good-fitting models (root-mean-square errors of approximation ≤0.08, comparative fit indices, and nonnormed fit indices ≥0.95) for 3 groups defined by anticipated primary mode of locomotion at discharge-walking, wheelchair propulsion, or both. Reestimation as a multigroup, MIRT model yielded scores more sensitive to change compared with QI mobility items (dlast-first = 1.08 vs 0.60 for the QI; dmax-min = 1.16 vs 1.05 for the QI). True score equating analysis demonstrated a higher ceiling and lower floor for the Mobility AQ than the QI. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The Mobility AQ demonstrates improved sensitivity over the QI mobility items. This MIRT-based mobility measure describes patient function and progress for patients served by IRFs and has the potential to reduce assessment burden and improve communication regarding patient functional status.Video Abstract available for more insights from authors (see the Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, available at: http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A341).

Development of a Multidimensional, Multigroup Measure of Self-Care for Inpatient Rehabilitation.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate a measure of clinician-observed and patient-performed self-care function for use during inpatient rehabilitation. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of self-care assessments collected by therapists using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) followed by multidimensional item response theory (MIRT). SETTING: Freestanding inpatient rehabilitation hospital in the Midwestern United States. PARTICIPANTS: Inpatients (N=7719) with stroke, traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury, neurologic disorders, and musculoskeletal conditions. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A total of 19 clinician-selected self-care measures including the FIM and patient-performed, clinician-rated measures of balance, upper extremity function, strength, changing body position, and swallowing. Clinicians completed assessments on admission and at least 1 interim assessment. RESULTS: CFA was completed for 3 patient groups defined by their highest level of balance (sitting, standing, walking). We reduced the number of items by 47.5% while maintaining acceptable internal consistency; unidimensionality within each item set required development of testlets. A recursive analysis defined a self-care measure with sensitivity (Cohen dmax-min =1.13; Cohen dlast-first.=0.91) greater than the FIM self-care items (dmax-min.=0.94; dlast-first .=0.83). The CFA models provided good to acceptable fit (root mean square error of approximations 0.03-0.06). Most patients with admission FIM self-care ratings of total assistance (88%, 297 of 338) made improvements on the MIRT self-care measure that were undetected by the FIM; the FIM detected no change for 26% of these patients (78 of 297). The remaining 74% (219 of 297) improved on the MIRT-based measure an average of 14 days earlier than was detected by the FIM. CONCLUSIONS: This MIRT self-care measure possesses measurement properties that are superior to the FIM, particularly for patients near its floor or ceiling. Methods assure accommodation for multidimensionality and high levels of sensitivity. This self-care measure has the potential to improve monitoring of self-care and manage therapy effectively during inpatient rehabilitation.

Applications of complementary therapies during rehabilitation for individuals with traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: Findings from the SCIRehab Project.

Objective: Evaluate the use of complementary therapies during rehabilitation for patients with traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). Design: Secondary analyses were conducted to identify the use and associated outcomes of complementary therapies provided by occupational therapists (OTs) and physical therapists (PTs) during rehabilitation from a public dataset. Setting: Inpatient rehabilitation. Participants: A public dataset composed of 1376 patients with SCI that were enrolled in a five-year, multi-center investigation, the SCIRehab Project. Secondary analyses focused on a subset of 93 patients (47 who received complementary therapy during treatment and 46 case-matched controls who received no complementary therapy). Interventions: OTs and PTs recorded use of complementary therapies during sessions, including yoga, Pilates, tai chi, aromatherapy, relaxation techniques, imagery and other. Outcome Measures: Pain interference, pain severity, mobility, and social integration. Results: Three percent of participants received any complementary therapies. Patients who received complementary therapies showed greater reductions in pain severity from 6 months to 12 months relative to matched controls. Furthermore, the amount of time that patients received complementary therapies during physical therapy sessions was associated with reduced pain interference at 6 months and with reduced pain severity at the 6-month and 12-month follow-ups. Complementary therapy use was not associated with mobility or social integration. Conclusion: The current study provides preliminary evidence documenting the limited use of complementary therapies in rehabilitation settings and highlights the opportunity for further research, particularly regarding pain-related outcomes.